Charles Raso v. Fontaine Masonry Restoration, Inc. et al
| Charles Raso, as Trustee of the Massachusetts Bricklayers and Masons Health and Welfare Pension and Annuity Funds and Charles Raso |
| James W Fontaine and Fontaine Masonry Restoration, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv10352 |
| February 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Denise J Casper |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Judge Denise J. Casper: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint, James W Fontaine answer due 6/3/2019; Fontaine Masonry Restoration, Inc. answer due 6/3/2019. (Hourihan, Lisa) |
| Filing 10 Considering case reassignment, ELECTRONIC NOTICE Canceling 5/7/2019 Scheduling Conference before Magistrate Judge Bowler. (Putnam, Harold) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to June 3, 2019 to File Answer to Complaint by Charles Raso.(Bushey, Renee) |
| Filing 8 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Re-Assignment. Judge Denise J. Casper assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 7 Refusal to Consent to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge. . (Bushey, Renee) |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Hearing. Scheduling Conference set for 5/7/2019 02:30 PM in Courtroom 25 before Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler. (Putnam, Harold) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed James W Fontaine served on 3/13/2019, answer due 4/3/2019. (Bushey, Renee) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed Fontaine Masonry Restoration, Inc. served on 3/13/2019, answer due 4/3/2019. (Bushey, Renee) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to James W Fontaine, Fontaine Masonry Restoration, Inc.. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (McKillop, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against James W Fontaine, Fontaine Masonry Restoration, Inc. Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0101-7553445 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Charles Raso, as Trustee of the Massachusetts Bricklayers and Masons Health and Welfare Pension and Annuity Funds. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Category Form)(Bushey, Renee) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
