Vieira v. Rooney et al
| Carlos Vieira |
| Kevin F Coppinger, Elspeth B Cypher and Lynn C. Rooney |
| 1:2019cv10380 |
| March 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Leo T Sorokin |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. CLOSING ORDER DISMISSING CASE.(Montes, Mariliz) |
| Filing 10 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. In light of Respondents' filing, Doc. No. 9, the Court need not unseal the Petition or its exhibits, as respondents have now publicly filed a complete copy of those documents redacting only the information required to be redacted per the Federal Rules (Doc. No. 9-2).(Montes, Mariliz) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE TO COURT ORDER by Kevin F Coppinger, Elspeth B Cypher, Lynn C. Rooney re 7 Order,, . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State court impoundment order, #2 Exhibit Proposed redacted petition + exhibits)(Haskell, Eric) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric A. Haskell on behalf of Kevin F Coppinger, Elspeth B Cypher, Lynn C. Rooney (Haskell, Eric) |
| Filing 7 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. The Clerk is hereby directed to UNSEAL docket entries 2, 3, 4, and 5 in this matter, as the petitioner has not offered any reason justifying their sealing. The petition and its attached exhibits include information that apparently was sealed by a state court, at least until March 15, 2019. No later than Tuesday, April 2, 2019, counsel for the respondents shall notify this Court what, if any, portions of the petition and its exhibits should remain sealed in this Court and why. If sealing remains appropriate, counsel for the respondents shall submit with the notice redacted versions of the relevant documents for filing on the public docket.(Montes, Mariliz) |
| Filing 6 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered.The 1 Petition for Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust administrative remedies as the Petition itself acknowledges that Petitioner's detention is the subject of ongoing state court proceedings including a hearing before a Single Justice of the Supreme Judicial Court next week. The Emergency Motion for Expedited Hearing (#2) is DENIED AS MOOT in light of the Court's dismissal of the petition and, in any event, as unnecessary as the papers before the Court explain sufficiently Petitioner's arguments. The Motion to Seal (#3) is ALLOWED IN PART as described in the Court's Order. The Court shall SEAL the Petition because it sets forth facts that according to counsel have been sealed until March 15, 2019 by the Commonwealth's courts. As to all other docket entries, the Petitioner shall by close of business Monday March 4, 2019 show cause why the Court should not unseal the entire docket other than the Petition. A failure to respond, shall result in all documents other than the Petition being unsealed on Tuesday March 5, 2019. The Petition shall be unsealed on March 16, 2019. This Order shall issue as an UNSEALED Order. (Montes, Mariliz) Modified on 3/1/2019 to correct Order. NEF Regenerated (Montes, Mariliz). |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Leo T. Sorokin assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal. (Danieli, Chris) |
| Filing 4 Filing fee/payment: $5.00, receipt number 1BST073169 for 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) (Coppola, Katelyn) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Seal by Carlos Vieira.(Coppola, Katelyn) |
| Filing 2 EMERGENCY MOTION for EXPEDITED Hearing re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) by Carlos Vieira.(Coppola, Katelyn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
