Evariste v. State of Massachusetts et al
| Emmanuel Evariste |
| Officer Velez and State of Massachusetts |
| 1:2019cv10727 |
| April 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| William G Young |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Judge William G. Young: ORDER entered. ORDER DISMISSING CASE(PSSA, 4) |
| Filing 6 Judge William G. Young: ORDER entered granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The complaint is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). (PSSA, 4) |
| Filing 5 Request for notice of default by Emmanuel Evariste. (Paine, Matthew) |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge William G. Young assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 3
General Order 09-1, dated January 6, 2009 regarding the E-Government Act and Personal Identifiers entered. (Castilla, Francis)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Emmanuel Evariste. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Inmate Statement)(Castilla, Francis) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Velez, State of Massachusetts, filed by Emmanuel Evariste.(Castilla, Francis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
