In Re. Laudani et al
| Nicholas Laudani |
| Manhattan Financial Services, Inc., Robert J. Walsh and Mary Ann Walsh |
| 1:2019cv10932 |
| April 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Mark G Mastroianni |
| Bankruptcy Withdrawl |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to July 8, 2019 to File Objections, with certificate of conference, filed by Nicholas Laudani.(Baker, David) |
| Filing 10 Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered denying #9 Motion for Leave to File Late Statement of Objections to Report and Recommendations without prejudice for failure to certify compliance with Local Rule 7.1(a)(2) by conferring with opposing counsel and indicating to the court whether the motion for leave to file will be opposed. (Lindsay, Maurice) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to June 27, 2019 to File Objections , with certificate of service, filed by Nicholas Laudani.(Baker, David) |
| Filing 8 EXHIBIT (Trial Transcript) by Nicholas Laudani. (Baker, David) |
| Filing 7 EXHIBIT (Bankruptcy Court Record) by Nicholas Laudani. (Baker, David) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE by Nicholas Laudani re 5 Order,,,,, (Baker, David) |
| Filing 5 Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. Pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9033(b), objections to the bankruptcy courts proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law are to be filed [w]ithin 14 days after being served with a copy of the proposed findings or conclusions objected to and state the grounds for such objection. Additionally, [a] party objecting to the bankruptcy judges proposed findings or conclusions shall arrange promptly for the transcription of the record. Id. Requests for extensions of time to file objections are to be filed with the bankruptcy judge. Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9033(c); see also Hunt v. Parkway Trans., Inc., 254 B.R. 561, 564-65 (W.D. Tex. 2001) (comparing rules for district court review of magistrate judges report and recommendation and bankruptcy judges proposed findings and conclusions and concluding that pursuant to bankruptcy rules, only a bankruptcy judge can grant an extension of time for filing objections). As no objections appear to have been filed, this court takes the bankruptcy courts proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law under advisement. Following de novo review, the scope of which is necessarily limited by the absence of a record beyond the bankruptcy courts proposal, this court will issue its order. (Rivera, Christina) |
| Filing 4 Letter/request (non-motion) from David Baker, Esq., on behalf of Nicholas Laudarni , with certificate of service.. (Baker, David) |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Mark G. Mastroianni assigned to case. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 2 Copy of Bankruptcy Docket Received: #1 Bankruptcy Appeal (Coppola, Katelyn) |
| Filing 1 Notice of APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT. Bankruptcy Court case number 16-01148. File received (Attachments: #1 Initial Transmittal)(Coppola, Katelyn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
