Shealey vs Banker's Standard Insurance Company et al
| Glenn E. Shealey |
| Banker's Standard Insurance Company and Ace Property and Casualty Insurance Company |
| 1:2019cv11008 |
| April 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Nathaniel M Gorton |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered ALLOWING #13 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Response due by 7/10/2019 (Vieira, Leonardo) |
| Filing 13 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to July 10, 2019 to File Response/Reply as to #11 Memorandum in Support of Motion, #10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Glenn E. Shealey.(Deptula, George) |
| Filing 12 ELECTRONIC NOTICE issued requesting courtesy copy for #11 Memorandum in Support of Motion. Counsel who filed this document are requested to submit a courtesy copy of it to the Clerk's Office. These documents must be clearly marked as a Courtesy Copy and reflect the document number assigned by CM/ECF. (Lima, Christine) |
| Filing 11 MEMORANDUM in Support re #10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Ace Property and Casualty Insurance Company, Banker's Standard Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Varga, Gregory) |
| Filing 10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Ace Property and Casualty Insurance Company, Banker's Standard Insurance Company.(Varga, Gregory) |
| Filing 9 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered ALLOWING #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply Responses due by 5/20/2019 (Vieira, Leonardo) |
| Filing 8 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to May 20, 2019 to File Response/Reply to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint by Ace Property and Casualty Insurance Company, Banker's Standard Insurance Company.(Varga, Gregory) |
| Filing 7 Certified Copy of Notice of Removal Provided to Defense Counsel by mail. (Lara, Miguel) |
| Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Ace Property and Casualty Insurance Company, Banker's Standard Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent INA Holdings Corporation, Corporate Parent INA Financial Corporation, Corporate Parent INA Corporation, Corporate Parent Chubb Limited, Corporate Parent Chubb INA Holdings, Inc., Corporate Parent Chubb Group Holdings Inc. for Ace Property and Casualty Insurance Company, Banker's Standard Insurance Company.. (Varga, Gregory) |
| Filing 5 Certified Copy of Notice of Removal Provided to Defense Counsel by Email (Lara, Miguel) |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein. (Danieli, Chris) |
Filing 3
General Order 09-1, dated January 6, 2009 regarding the E-Government Act and Personal Identifiers entered. (Lara, Miguel)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Gregory P. Varga on behalf of Ace Property and Casualty Insurance Company, Banker's Standard Insurance Company (Varga, Gregory) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Ace Property and Casualty Insurance Company, Banker's Standard Insurance Company ( Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0101-7660113 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 JS45)(Varga, Gregory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
