Class, Inc. v. SEIU Local 509
| Class, Inc. |
| SEIU Local 509 |
| 1:2019cv11085 |
| May 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Nathaniel M Gorton |
| Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Electronic Clerk's Notes for proceedings held before Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: Scheduling Conference held on 6/28/2019. Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings due by 7/26/2019, oppositions to be filed by 8/16/19. Motion Hearing, not to exceed one hour, set for 9/19/2019 03:00 PM in Courtroom 4 before Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton. (Court Reporter: No Court Reporter Used.)(Attorneys present: Wermuth, Hykel) (Lima, Christine) |
| Filing 12 First CERTIFICATION pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 of Defendant by SEIU Local 509.(Hykel, James) |
| Filing 11 ELECTRONIC NOTICE OF RESCHEDULING Scheduling Conference set for 6/28/2019 10:45 AM in Courtroom 4 before Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton. (Lima, Christine) |
| Filing 10 JOINT STATEMENT re scheduling conference . (Wermuth, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATION pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 of Plaintiff CLASS, Inc.. (Wermuth, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Class, Inc.. (Wermuth, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 7 STATE COURT Record. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Serivce)(Hykel, James) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Scheduling Conference Scheduling Conference set for 6/25/2019 02:15 PM in Courtroom 4 before Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton. (Lima, Christine) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by SEIU Local 509. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Arbitrator's Award, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Parties' CBA)(Hykel, James) |
| Filing 4 Certified Copy of Notice of Removal Provided to Defense Counsel by mail. (Kinsella, Devan) |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 2
General Order 09-1, dated January 6, 2009 regarding the E-Government Act and Personal Identifiers entered. (Kinsella, Devan)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by SEIU Local 509 ( Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0101-7679489 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover and Category, #2 Exhibit A)(Hykel, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Class, Inc. v. SEIU Local 509 | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SEIU Local 509 | |
| Represented By: | James Hykel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Class, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Geoffrey P. Wermuth |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
