Morell Colon v. Berryhill
Aracelis Morell Colon |
Nancy A. Berryhill |
Social Security Administration |
1:2019cv11146 |
May 20, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Marianne B Bowler |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
42 U.S.C. ยง 416 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 USMS SERVICE INSTRUCTIONS NOTICE Please note, instructions for service by the United States Marshals Service attached. USM 285 form may be found at www.usmarshals.gov/process/usm285.pdf and is also available from the Clerk upon request. (PSSA 5) |
Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Nancy A. Berryhill. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Hohler, Daniel) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Nancy A. Berryhill. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (PSSA, 5) |
Filing 6 Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis "Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Docket No. 2) is ALLOWED. The Clerk shall issue summons for service of the defendant. The plaintiff may elect to have service made by the United States Marshal Service. If directed by the plaintiff to do so, the United States Marshal shall serve the summons, complaint, and this Order upon the defendant, in the manner directed by the plaintiff, with all costs of service to be advanced by the United States. Notwithstanding Local Rule 4.1, the plaintiff shall have 90 days from the date of this Order to complete service." (PSSA, 5) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 4 General Order 09-1, dated January 6, 2009 regarding the E-Government Act and Personal Identifiers entered. (Vieira, Leonardo) |
Filing 3 Online access to documents in this case is limited to counsel of record only. All documents are available for review in the Office of the Clerk. Counsel of record: please note that you will need to log into CM/ECF to access any documents in this case. (Vieira, Leonardo) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Aracelis Morell Colon.(Lorenz, Nancy) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill (Fee Status: IFP requested), filed by Aracelis Morell Colon. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form)(Lorenz, Nancy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.