Joyce v. Saul
| Erin H Joyce |
| Nancy A Berryhill and Andrew M. Saul |
| Social Security Administration |
| 1:2019cv11281 |
| June 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| William G Young |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Andrew M. Saul. Local Rule 4.1 and instructions for service by the United States Marshals Service attached. USM 285 form may be found at www.usmarshals.gov/process/usm285.pdf and is also available from the Clerk upon request. (Attachments: #1 Instructions for Service by USMS and Local Rule 4.1)(PSSA, 3) |
| Filing 8 Judge William G. Young: ORDER entered. The motion #7 for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d), Andrew M. Saul, the Commissioner of Social Security, shall be substituted as the defendant. The Clerk shall issue a summons. The plaintiff is responsible for serving the complaint and summons in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 4.1 within 90 days of the date the summons is issued. If so asked by the plaintiff, the United States Marshals Service shall complete service as directed by the plaintiff with all costs of service to be advanced by the United States. The plaintiff is responsible for providing the United States Marshals Service all papers for service. (PSSA, 3) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Erin H Joyce.(Walsh, Michael) |
| Filing 6 Judge William G. Young: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #5 is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff neither responded to any of the questions on he second page of the form Application nor signed it. Without a complete financial statement, signed and sworn under the penalty of perjury by Plaintiff, the Court cannot determine Plaintiff's eligibility for in forma pauperis status. Plaintiff must, within 21 days, pay the $400 filing fee or file a renewed motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. If Plaintiff is without income or assets, the renewed motion must demonstrate how Plaintiff affords the necessities of life. Because the filing fee has not been resolved, the summons is WITHDRAWN. (PSSA, 3) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Erin H Joyce.(McDonagh, Christina) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Nancy A Berryhill. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (McDonagh, Christina) |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge William G. Young assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 2
General Order 09-1, dated January 6, 2009 regarding the E-Government Act and Personal Identifiers entered. (McDonagh, Christina)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill (Fee Status: IFP requested), filed by Erin H Joyce. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover, #2 Supplement Category Form 4, # 3 Supplement Waiver of Filing Fee)(Walsh, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
