Day v. Russo
Plaintiff: Roger Charles Day and Roger Charles Day, Jr.
Defendant: William Russo
Case Number: 1:2019cv11293
Filed: June 11, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: F Dennis Saylor
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 30, 2019 Filing 11 DOCKET SHEET sent to both parties in case (Halley, Taylor)
July 29, 2019 Filing 10 Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by 8/28/2019 by William Russo. (FDS, law3)
July 26, 2019 Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by William Russo.(Halley, Taylor)
July 11, 2019 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed William Russo served on 7/10/2019, answer due 7/31/2019. (Halley, Taylor)
June 20, 2019 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to William Russo and mailed to plaintiff on 6/20/19 with Local Rule 4.1 and form and instructions for service by USMS. (Attachments: #1 Instructions for Service by USMS and Local Rule 4.1)(PSSA, 3)
June 20, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE: re payment of fee (prisoner filer) issued to the Treasurer at FCI TERRE HAUTE [Notice mailed to plaintiff and treasurer on 6/20/19.] (PSSA, 3)
June 20, 2019 Filing 5 Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: ORDER entered granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The clerk shall issue a summons and the plaintiff shall serve the summons, complaint, and this order upon the defendant in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Because the plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, he may elect to have the United States Marshals Service complete service with all costs of service to be advanced by the United States. [Order mailed to plaintiff and FCI Terre Haute Treasurer on 6/29/19.] (PSSA, 3)
June 11, 2019 Filing 4 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal. (Finn, Mary)
June 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 General Order 09-1, dated January 6, 2009 regarding the E-Government Act and Personal Identifiers entered. (Castilla, Francis)
June 7, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Roger Day Charles, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Inmate Statement)(Castilla, Francis)
June 7, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against William Russo, filed by Roger Day Charles, Jr.(Castilla, Francis)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Day v. Russo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roger Charles Day
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roger Charles Day, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Russo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?