Baptista v. Lyons et al
| Alirio Teixeira Baptista |
| Mr. Todd Lyons, Superintendent Antone Moniz and Joseph D. McDonald, Jr. |
| 1:2019cv11467 |
| July 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Patti B Saris |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Chief Judge Patti B. Saris: ORDER entered. ORDER DISMISSING CASE(Molloy, Maryellen) |
| Filing 11 Chief Judge Patti B. Saris: ORDER entered Granting #8 Respondents' Motion to Dismiss Petitioner's - Petition as Moot..."Allowed without opposition". (Petitioner was released from Respondents custody on 7/19/19) (Molloy, Maryellen) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE to Motion re #8 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Alirio Teixeira Baptista. (Pomerleau, Todd) |
| Filing 9 MEMORANDUM in Support re #8 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Todd Lyons, Joseph D. McDonald, Jr, Antone Moniz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Sady, Michael) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss by Todd Lyons, Joseph D. McDonald, Jr, Antone Moniz.(Sady, Michael) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael P. Sady on behalf of Todd Lyons, Joseph D. McDonald, Jr, Antone Moniz (Sady, Michael) |
| Filing 6 Chief Judge Patti B. Saris: ORDER entered. The Court now orders the respondents to respond to the petition no later than Friday, July 26, 2019. The response shall be in the form of a motion to grant or deny the petition and a memorandum of law in support thereof. [Copy of this order sent to the respondents and Massachusetts Attorney General on 7/9/2019; copy of order delivered to US Attorney's Office (D. Mass.) on 7/9/2019 by leaving copy of the same in Clerk's office for pick up by US Attorney's Office, per usual business practice.](PSSA, 3) |
| Filing 5 Judge William G. Young: ORDER entered. SERVICE ORDER re 2241 Petition. The respondents shall respond to the petition on a date to be set later by the Court. The Courts Standing Order #3 and Temporary Restraining Order #4 remain in force. (PSSA, 3) (Main Document 5 replaced on 7/5/2019) (PSSA, 3). |
| Filing 4 Judge William G. Young: ORDER entered. TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER.(Gaudet, Jennifer) |
| Filing 3 Chief Judge Patti B. Saris: ORDER entered. STANDING ORDER on 2241 petitions regarding detention and removal of the Petitioner from the District of Massachusetts. In order to give the Court time to consider this matter, unless otherwise ordered by the Court, the petitioner shall not be moved outside the District of Massachusetts without providing the Court 48 hours' advance notice of the move and the reason therefor. Any such 48-hour notice period shall commence at the date and time such notice is filed and expire 48 hours later, except "[i]f the period would end on a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the period continues to run until the same time on the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday." Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a)(2)(C). (PSSA, 3) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Chief Judge Patti B. Saris assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (Rynne, Michelle) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number 0101-7765689 Fee status: Filing Fee paid., filed by Alirio Teixeira Baptista. (Attachments: #1 Category Form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pomerleau, Todd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
