Carrington v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
Phillip Carrington |
Commonwealth of Massachusetts and Maura T. Healey |
1:2019cv11552 |
July 16, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Richard G Stearns |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Gabriel T. Thornton on behalf of Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Maura T. Healey (Thornton, Gabriel) |
Filing 5 Copy re #4 Service Order - 2254 Petition, mailed to Respondent and the Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on 8/27/2019. (Pacho, Arnold) |
Filing 4 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ORDER entered. SERVICE ORDER re 2254 Petition. Order entered pursuant to R.4 of the Rules governing Section 2254 cases for service on respondents. Answer/responsive pleading due w/in 21 days of receipt of this order. (Pacho, Arnold) |
Filing 3 Filing fee/payment: $5.00, receipt number 1BST075463 for #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) (Coppola, Katelyn) |
Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Richard G. Stearns assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (Danieli, Chris) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28:2254, filed by Phillip Carrington. (McKillop, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.