Higgins v. City of Melrose et al
| John T Higgins |
| Stephen's Auto Body and Towing Service and City of Melrose |
| 1:2019cv11557 |
| July 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Patti B Saris |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Chief Judge Patti B. Saris: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. 2.If plaintiff wishes to proceed with this action, he shall, within 21 days of the date of this Order, show cause why this action should not be dismissed or file an amended complaint that cures the pleading deficiencies of the complaint. Failure of plaintiff to comply with this directive within 21 days of the date of this Order will result in the dismissal of this action. (PSSA, 4) |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Chief Judge Patti B. Saris assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal. (Danieli, Chris) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by John T Higgins.(Castilla, Francis) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by John T Higgins. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(Castilla, Francis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
