The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company v. Chen et al
| The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and Kellerman J. Zheng |
| Jian Feng Zheng and Lu Di Chen |
| 1:2019cv11843 |
| August 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Patti B Saris |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Notice of correction to docket made by Court staff. Correction: Dkt. No. 13-1 was removed and refiled, it was corrected because: Memorandum of Law must be filed as a separate document. Counsel is reminded to review local rules and the attorney handbook when filing documents with the Court. (Lara, Miguel) |
| Filing 14 MEMORANDUM in Support re #13 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Defendants Lu Di Chen, Jian Feng Zheng, and Kellerman J. Zheng filed by The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company. (Lara, Miguel) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Defendants Lu Di Chen, Jian Feng Zheng, and Kellerman J. Zheng by The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company. (Attachments: #2 Affidavit Affidavit of Kristen N. Shoaf, #3 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Form of Default Judgment)(Pomeroy, Scott) Modified on 10/25/2019, refer to Notice of Correction entered on 10/25/19. (Lara, Miguel). |
| Filing 12 Chief Judge Patti B. Saris: STANDING ORDER entered on motions for default judgment re #10 Notice: Clerk's Entry of Default, #11 Notice: Clerk's Entry of Default, #9 Notice: Clerk's Entry of Default. (Lara, Miguel) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE: Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Lu Di Chen. (Lara, Miguel) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE: Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Jian Feng Zheng. (Lara, Miguel) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE: Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Kellerman J. Zheng. (Lara, Miguel) |
| Filing 8 Chief Judge Patti B. Saris: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #7 Motion for Entry of Default. (Lara, Miguel) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Entry of Default by The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company.(Pomeroy, Scott) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed Kellerman J. Zheng served on 9/7/2019, answer due 9/30/2019. (Pomeroy, Scott) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed Jian Feng Zheng served on 9/7/2019, answer due 9/30/2019. (Pomeroy, Scott) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed Lu Di Chen served on 9/7/2019, answer due 9/30/2019. (Pomeroy, Scott) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Coppola, Katelyn) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Chief Judge Patti B. Saris assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein. (adminn, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kellerman J. Zheng, Jian Feng Zheng, Lu Di Chen Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0101-7854823 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Application for Insurance, #2 Exhibit B - Copy of Policy, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Category Form)(Decker, Byrne) Modified on 8/30/2019 restricted due to personal identifiers (Warnock, Douglas). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
