Martinez v. Lagos
| Claudia Martinez |
| Jesus P Lagos |
| 1:2019cv11931 |
| September 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| George A OToole |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Jesus P Lagos. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Memorandum of Law)(Borgas, Danilo) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Danilo A. Borgas on behalf of Jesus P Lagos (Borgas, Danilo) |
| Filing 5 Judge George A. O'Toole, Jr: Electronic Order entered: The emergency motion of the Plaintiff, Claudia Martinez, for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction #4 is DENIED. The plaintiff has failed to show that she is likely to suffer irreparable harm absent emergency relief as she acknowledges that she has been unable to access the premises of the business since on or after November 1, 2013. Additionally, the plaintiff's claim that there is a substantial risk that without injunctive relief she will see no recovery on a judgment is insufficient. Ross-Simons of Warwick, Inc. v. Baccarat, Inc., 102 F.3d 12, 19 (1st Cir. 1996) ("the plaintiff's showing must possess some substance; a preliminary injunction is not warranted by a tenuous or overly speculative forecast of anticipated harm"). (Halley, Taylor) |
| Filing 4 Emergency MOTION for Injunctive Relief and Temporary Restraining Order by Claudia Martinez. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order proposed order)(Cissero, Miryam) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Jesus P Lagos. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Burgos, Sandra) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge George A. OToole, Jr assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Claudia Martinez against All Defendants Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0101-7872113 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Claudia Martinez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet civil cover and docketsheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibits)(Cissero, Miryam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Martinez v. Lagos | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Jesus P Lagos | |
| Represented By: | Danilo A. Borgas |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Claudia Martinez | |
| Represented By: | Miryam E. Cissero |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
