Viken Detection Corporation, et al v. Doe
| VIKEN DETECTION CORPORATION, and Peter J. Rothschild |
| John Doe |
| 1:2019cv12034 |
| September 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Nathaniel M Gorton |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1030 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (Russo, Noreen) |
| Filing 13 Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell: ORDER entered granting #2 MOTION for Discovery for leave to issue third party subpoenas in aid of determination of the identify of John Doe filed by Peter J. Rothschild, VIKEN DETECTION CORPORATION. (Russo, Noreen) |
| Filing 12 Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM OF DECISION on Motion for leave to Issue Third Party Subpoenas re #2 MOTION for Discovery for leave to issue third party subpoenas in aid of determination of the identify of John Doe. (Russo, Noreen) |
| Filing 11 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell Referred for: Events Only (e). Motions referred: #2 MOTION for Discovery for leave to issue third party subpoenas in aid of determination of the identify of John Doe. (Lima, Christine) Motions referred to Donald L. Cabell. |
| Filing 10 Summons Issued as to John Doe. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (McKillop, Matthew) |
| Filing 9 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 8 Proposed Document(s) submitted by Peter J. Rothschild, VIKEN DETECTION CORPORATION,. Document received: Proposed Order for Leave to Issue Third Party Subpoenas. (Cogswell, Lawrence) |
| Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by VIKEN DETECTION CORPORATION,. (Cogswell, Lawrence) |
| Filing 6 DECLARATION of Samuel J. Sussman, Esq. by Peter J. Rothschild, VIKEN DETECTION CORPORATION,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Cogswell, Lawrence) |
| Filing 5 DECLARATION of Plaintiff Peter J. Rothschild, PhD by Peter J. Rothschild, VIKEN DETECTION CORPORATION,. (Cogswell, Lawrence) |
| Filing 4 DECLARATION of Michael Perry, digital forensics expert, by Peter J. Rothschild, VIKEN DETECTION CORPORATION,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Cogswell, Lawrence) |
| Filing 3 MEMORANDUM in Support re #2 MOTION for Discovery for leave to issue third party subpoenas in aid of determination of the identify of John Doe filed by Peter J. Rothschild, VIKEN DETECTION CORPORATION,. (Cogswell, Lawrence) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Discovery for leave to issue third party subpoenas in aid of determination of the identify of John Doe by Peter J. Rothschild, VIKEN DETECTION CORPORATION,.(Cogswell, Lawrence) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Doe Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0101-7899513 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Peter J. Rothschild, VIKEN DETECTION CORPORATION,. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement Category Form)(Cogswell, Lawrence) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
