Semedo v. Hodgson
| Amadeu Mendes Semedo |
| Thomas M. Hodgson |
| 1:2019cv12067 |
| October 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Nathaniel M Gorton |
| Deportation |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. ORDER DISMISSING CASE(Lima, Christine) |
| Filing 8 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Amadeu Mendes Semedo. (Vieira, Leonardo) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE TO COURT ORDER by Thomas M. Hodgson re #1 Petition for Write of Habeas Corpus (2241) and Notice of Release of Petitioner from Detention. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit ICE affidavit)(Balakrishna, Annapurna) Modified on 11/6/2019 (Lima, Christine). |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Annapurna Balakrishna on behalf of Thomas M. Hodgson (Balakrishna, Annapurna) |
| Filing 5 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER of SERVICE entered granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The clerk shall serve a copy of the petition upon Sheriff Hodgson and the United States Attorney for the District of Massachusetts. Respondent Thomas M. Hodgson shall respond to the petition within 21 days of the entry of this order. In order to give the Court time to consider the matter, unless otherwise ordered by the Court, the petitioner shall not be moved outside the District of Massachusetts without providing the Court 48 hours' advance notice of the move and the reason therefor. Any such 48-hour notice period shall commence at the date and time such notice is filed and expire 48 hours later, except "[i]f the period would end on a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the period continues to run until the same time on the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday." Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a)(2)(C). (PSSA, 4) |
| Filing 4 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. STANDING ORDER on 2241 petitions regarding detention and removal of the Petitioner from the District of Massachusetts. re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) filed by Amadeu Mendes Semedo (Danieli, Chris) |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley. (Danieli, Chris) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Amadeu Mendes Semedo.(Castilla, Francis) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), filed by Amadeu Mendes Semedo.(Castilla, Francis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Semedo v. Hodgson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Amadeu Mendes Semedo | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Thomas M. Hodgson | |
| Represented By: | Annapurna Balakrishna |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
