Hatik v. Hodgson
| Hamza Hatik |
| Sheriff Thomas M. Hodgson |
| 1:2019cv12069 |
| October 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Leo T Sorokin |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER OF DISMISSAL & CLOSING ORDER entered. The Court has been advised that the petitioner has been removed on November 12, 2019. Doc. 11. It is hereby ORDERED that the Petitioners Habeas Petition is denied as moot. This action is dismissed and the clerk shall close this case. (Simeone, Maria) |
| Filing 11 STATUS REPORT by Thomas M. Hodgson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Weida, Jason) |
| Filing 9 DOCKET SHEET sent to Petitioner via first class mail. (Montes, Mariliz) |
| Filing 8 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. The government shall file a status report at the earlier of Petitioner's removal or November 18, 2019.( Government's Status Report due by 11/18/2019)(Montes, Mariliz) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE by Thomas M. Hodgson re #5 Standing Order on 2241 petitions - Alien Detainee of Intent to Remove (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Weida, Jason) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Jason C. Weida on behalf of Thomas M. Hodgson (Weida, Jason) |
| Filing 10 Filing fee/payment: $5.00, receipt number 1BST077070 for #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), #3 PSSA Order 2 (Coppola, Katelyn) |
| Filing 5 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. STANDING ORDER on 2241 petitions regarding detention and removal of the Petitioner from the District of Massachusetts. (Montes, Mariliz) |
Filing 4
General Order 19-02, dated June 1, 2019 regarding Public Access to Immigration Cases Restricted by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c). (Castilla, Francis)
|
| Filing 3 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. Procedural Order regarding resolution of filing fee. Plaintiff must respond within 21 days. (Castilla, Francis) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Leo T. Sorokin assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), filed by Hamza Hatik.(Castilla, Francis) (Main Document 1 replaced on 10/25/2019) (Montes, Mariliz). Modified on 10/25/2019 to delete blank pages (Montes, Mariliz). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hatik v. Hodgson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Sheriff Thomas M. Hodgson | |
| Represented By: | Jason C. Weida |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Hamza Hatik | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
