Carroll v. Social Security
Plaintiff: David D. Carroll
Defendant: Commissioner Andrew Saul
Interested Party: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 1:2019cv12076
Filed: October 7, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: M Page Kelley
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 20, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Ronald W. Makawa on behalf of Andrew Saul (Makawa, Ronald)
October 7, 2019 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Currie, Haley)
October 7, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Danieli, Chris)
October 7, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew R. Butler on behalf of David D. Carroll (Butler, Matthew)
October 7, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0101-7912924 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by David D. Carroll. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - ALJ Decision (04/04/18), #2 Exhibit B - Appeals Council Notice (04/08/19), #3 Exhibit C - Appeals Council Decision (08/13/19), #4 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Civil Cover Sheet Category Form)(Murray, Vincent) Attachments 4 and 5 replaced to flatten files. (Haley Currie).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carroll v. Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David D. Carroll
Represented By: Matthew R. Butler
Represented By: Vincent A. Murray, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner Andrew Saul
Represented By: Ronald W. Makawa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Christopher A. Michaels
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?