Tavares v. Commonwealth of Massachuesett
Petitioner: Daniel D. Tavares
Respondent: Commonwealth of Massachuesett and Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Case Number: 1:2019cv12149
Filed: October 24, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: Nathaniel M Gorton
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 27, 2019 Filing 12 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered ALLOWING #11 MOTION for Extension of Time to 02/28/2020 to File Answer. (Vieira, Leonardo)
November 26, 2019 Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to 02/28/2020 to File Answer or Other Responsive Pleading by Commonwealth of Massachusetts.(Zalnasky, Jennifer)
November 26, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Jennifer K. Zalnasky on behalf of Commonwealth of Massachusetts (Zalnasky, Jennifer)
November 25, 2019 Filing 9 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Daniel D. Tavares (Vieira, Leonardo)
November 25, 2019 Filing 8 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Daniel D. Tavares (Vieira, Leonardo)
November 8, 2019 Filing 7 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. SERVICE ORDER re 2254 Petition. Order entered pursuant to R.4 of the Rules governing Section 2254 cases for service on respondents. Answer/responsive pleading due w/in 21 days of receipt of this order. (Lima, Christine)
November 7, 2019 Filing 6 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (PSSA, 3)
November 4, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Daniel D. Tavares.(Vieira, Leonardo)
October 25, 2019 Filing 4 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. Procedural Order regarding resolution of filling fee. Petitioner must respond within 21 days. (Castilla, Francis)
October 25, 2019 Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler. (Danieli, Chris)
October 24, 2019 Filing 2 Remark Envelope address to : Judge Denise Casper (Castilla, Francis)
October 24, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28:2254, filed by Daniel D. Tavares. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Castilla, Francis)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tavares v. Commonwealth of Massachuesett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Commonwealth of Massachuesett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Represented By: Jennifer K. Zalnasky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Daniel D. Tavares
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?