Firman v. City of Boston et al
| Gregory Firman |
| Mayor Martin J Walsh, Officer William Keller, Boston Police Department, Officer William Robertson, Officer Carl Nemes, City of Boston and Officer Charles Keller |
| 1:2019cv12158 |
| October 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Allison D Burroughs |
| Douglas P Woodlock |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 ANSWER to #3 Amended Complaint by Carl Nemes.(Anjomi, Nieve) |
| Filing 14 Opposition re #8 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Gregory Firman. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss)(Mitcheson, H.) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by H. Luke Mitcheson on behalf of Gregory Firman (Mitcheson, H.) |
| Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Gregory Firman. Carl Nemes waiver sent on 12/18/2019, answer due 2/18/2020. (Glickman, Paul) |
| Filing 11 Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #8 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Responses due by 1/24/2020 (Folan, Karen) |
| Filing 10 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to 01/24/2020 to File Response/Reply as to #8 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Gregory Firman.(Glickman, Paul) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Nieve Anjomi on behalf of City of Boston (Anjomi, Nieve) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss , MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM ( Responses due by 1/6/2020) by Boston Police Department, City of Boston. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Memorandum of Law, #2 Exhibit Presentment Letter)(Fahey, John) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Gregory Firman. City of Boston waiver sent on 12/4/2019, answer due 2/3/2020. (Glickman, Paul) |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Reassignment. Judge Allison D. Burroughs added. Judge Douglas P. Woodlock no longer assigned to case. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 5 Judge Douglas P. Woodlock: ORDER - Pursuant to Local Rule 40.1(i)(1), with the approval of Chief Judge Saris, I return this case from the docket of this session to the Clerk for reassignment in the ordinary course. (Beatty, Barbara) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Halley, Taylor) |
| Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Carl Nemes, Boston Police Department, William Robertson, City of Boston, William Keller, filed by Gregory Firman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 JS45)(Glickman, Paul) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Douglas P. Woodlock assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler. (Danieli, Chris) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0101-7930638 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Gregory Firman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 JS45)(Glickman, Paul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
