Emrit v. National Football League et al
Ronald Satish Emrit |
Daniel Snyder, Washigton RedSkins and National Football League |
1:2019cv12272 |
November 5, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Patti B Saris |
Trademark |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Ronald S. Emrit. (Lara, Miguel) |
Filing 6 Chief Judge Patti B. Saris: ORDER entered. ORDER DISMISSING CASE(PSSA, 4) |
Filing 5 Chief Judge Patti B. Saris: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered dismissing this action without prejudice and denying as moot #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (PSSA, 4) |
Filing 4 Remark: Completed summons and US Marshal forms submitted to the court. Summons have not been issued by the court. (Jones, Sherry) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Chief Judge Patti B. Saris assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ronald Satish Emrit.(Castilla, Francis) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Ronald Satish Emrit. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Castilla, Francis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.