Reed v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Denise Reed
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 1:2019cv12369
Filed: November 19, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: Patti B Saris
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 21, 2019 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Castilla, Francis)
November 21, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF for service by USMS; Local Rule 4.1 and FRCP 4(i). (PSSA, 4)
November 20, 2019 Filing 5 Chief Judge Patti B. Saris: ORDER entered 1.The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. 2.The Clerk shall issue a summons for service of the defendant. 3.Because the plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, she may elect to have the United States Marshals Service (USMS) complete service with all costs of service to be advanced by the United States. If so asked by the plaintiff, the USMS shall serve copies of the summons, complaint, and this Order upon the defendant as directed by plaintiff. 4.The plaintiff shall have 90 days from the date of the issuance of the summons to complete service. (PSSA, 4)
November 19, 2019 Filing 4 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Chief Judge Patti B. Saris assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein. (Finn, Mary)
November 19, 2019 Filing 3 Chief Judge Patti B. Saris: ORDER entered. Procedural Order re Social Security Action. (Lara, Miguel)
November 19, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Denise Reed.(Valentine, Elizabeth)
November 19, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration (Fee Status: IFP requested), filed by Denise Reed. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Local Category Sheet)(Valentine, Elizabeth)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reed v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Christopher Michaels
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Denise Reed
Represented By: Elizabeth A. Valentine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?