Cavitt v. Massachusetts Department of Corrections et al
| Brian Keith Cavitt |
| Harold W. Clarke, Abbe E. Nelligan, Joy Gallant, Massachusetts Department of Corrections and Carol A. Mici |
| 1:2019cv12479 |
| December 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Nathaniel M Gorton |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Letter/request (non-motion) from Brian Keith Cavitt. (Vieira, Leonardo) |
| Filing 7 Letter/request (non-motion) from Brian Keith Cavitt. (Vieira, Leonardo) |
| Filing 6 Copy of docket sheet mailed to Brian Keith Cavitt 12/9/2019. (Kelly, Danielle) |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Brian Keith Cavitt.(Kelly, Danielle) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Brian Keith Cavitt. (Kelly, Danielle) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Brian Keith Cavitt.(Kelly, Danielle) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Brian Keith Cavitt. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-O, #2 Summons, #3 Civil Cover Sheet & Category Sheet, #4 Cover Letter)(Kelly, Danielle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
