National Union Fire Ins. Company of Pittsburgh, PA v. Perez
| National Union Fire Ins. Company of Pittsburgh, PA |
| Katie Perez |
| 1:2019cv12507 |
| December 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Allison D Burroughs |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Remark: certified mail receipt for [ECF Nos. 7, 8]. (Pacho, Arnold) |
| Filing 9 Copy re #7 Notice: Clerk's Entry of Default, #8 Standing Order re motions for default judgment mailed to Katie Perez aka Katie Cunningham on 1/23/2020. (McDonagh, Christina) |
| Filing 8 Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ORDER entered. STANDING ORDER on motions for default judgment re #7 Notice: Clerk's Entry of Default (McDonagh, Christina) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE: Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Katie Perez (McDonagh, Christina) |
| Filing 6 Request for notice of default by National Union Fire Ins. Company of Pittsburgh, PA . (Russman, David) |
| Filing 5 Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. On January 3, 2020, plaintiff filed an affidavit of service demonstrating that the complaint was served on defendant on December 23, 2019. [ECF No. #4 ]. As of January 21, 2020, the defendant has not answered or otherwise responded to the complaint. Plaintiff shall file a request for entry of default by January 31, 2020, or the action may be dismissed. (McDonagh, Christina) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed Katie Perez served on 12/23/2019, answer due 1/13/2020. (Russman, David) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Katie Perez. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Halley, Taylor) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Allison D. Burroughs assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Katie Perez Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0101-8011755 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by National Union Fire Ins. Company of Pittsburgh, PA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Sheet)(Russman, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: National Union Fire Ins. Company of Pittsburgh, PA v. Perez | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Katie Perez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: National Union Fire Ins. Company of Pittsburgh, PA | |
| Represented By: | David P. Russman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
