Regalado v. McDonald Jr.
Plaintiff: Regalado Alifonso Romero and Alifonso Romero Regalado
Defendant: Joseph D. McDonald, Jr.
Case Number: 1:2019cv12576
Filed: December 23, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: Judith G Dein
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 30, 2020 Filing 12 NOTICE by Joseph D. McDonald, Jr to Rmove (Sady, Michael)
January 25, 2020 Filing 11 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Alifonso Romero Regalado (Keefe, William)
January 22, 2020 Filing 10 ELECTRONIC REMINDER TO COUNSEL: A notification form indicating whether or not the parties have consented to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge has not been filed. Submission of the form is mandatory and a completed form should be filed promptly. Additional forms can be obtained on the Court's web page at http://www.mad.uscourts.gov. (Dambrosio, Jolyne)
January 22, 2020 Filing 9 Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting re #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Petition. Response due by 1/28/2020. (Dambrosio, Jolyne)
January 21, 2020 Filing 8 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to 1/28/20 to File Response/Reply by Joseph D. McDonald, Jr.(Sady, Michael)
January 6, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael P. Sady on behalf of Joseph D. McDonald, Jr (Sady, Michael)
December 30, 2019 Filing 6 Remark: Consent Package. (PSSA, 3)
December 30, 2019 Filing 5 Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein: ORDER entered. SERVICE ORDER re 2241 Petition. The Clerk of this Court shall serve a copy of the Petition upon Plymouth County Sheriff Joseph McDonald Jr. and the United States Attorney for the District of Massachusetts. Respondent shall, no later than Tuesday, January 21, 2020, show cause why the Petition should not be granted. Pursuant to the Standing Order of the United States Federal Court for the District of Massachusetts on 2241 Petitions, to give the Court time to consider this matter, unless otherwise ordered by the Court, Petitioner shall not be moved outside the District of Massachusetts without providing the Court 48 hours advance notice of the move and the reason therefor. The Clerk shall provide Petitioners counsel, Respondent, and the United States Attorney for the District of Massachusetts with the form for Consent/Refusal of Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction and the instructions for that form (consent package). Counsel for Petitioner is responsible for contacting Respondents counsel to inquire as to their consent or refusal to proceed before the Magistrate Judge and for informing the Court whether both parties consent to final assignment of the action to the Magistrate Judge. (PSSA, 3)
December 26, 2019 Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein: ORDER entered. STANDING ORDER on 2241 petitions regarding detention and removal of the Petitioner from the District of Massachusetts. (PSSA, 3)
December 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 General Order 19-02, dated June 1, 2019 regarding Public Access to Immigration Cases Restricted by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c). (Pacho, Arnold)
December 23, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (adminn, )
December 23, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number 0101-8027069 Fee status: Filing Fee paid., filed by Regalado Alifonso Romero.(Keefe, William) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/3/2020: #1 Cover and Category Forms) (Pacho, Arnold).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Regalado v. McDonald Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Regalado Alifonso Romero
Represented By: William Keefe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alifonso Romero Regalado
Represented By: William Keefe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joseph D. McDonald, Jr.
Represented By: Michael P. Sady
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?