Dutcher v. Mici
| John E. Dutcher |
| Carol Mici |
| 1:2019cv12580 |
| December 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Patti B Saris |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Copy re #13 Order mailed to John E. Dutcher on 1/23/2020. (Lara, Miguel) |
| Filing 13 Judge Patti B. Saris: ORDER entered re #12 Opposition to Motion filed by John E. Dutcher. "Denied as moot." (Lara, Miguel) |
| Filing 12 Opposition re #8 MOTION for Leave to Dispense with the Conference Requirement of Local Rule 7.1 filed by John E. Dutcher. (Lara, Miguel) |
| Filing 11 Judge Patti B. Saris: ORDER entered granting #8 MOTION for Leave to Dispense with the Conference Requirement of Local Rule 7.1. (Lara, Miguel) |
| Filing 10 Judge Patti B. Saris: ORDER entered granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time. Response deadline due by March 6, 2020. (Lara, Miguel) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE by Carol Mici -- Statement Regarding Existence of Victim (Lumelsky, Anna) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Dispense with the Conference Requirement of Local Rule 7.1 by Carol Mici.(Lumelsky, Anna) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to March 6, 2020 to File an Answer or Responsive Pleading to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Carol Mici.(Lumelsky, Anna) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Anna E. Lumelsky on behalf of Carol Mici (Lumelsky, Anna) |
| Filing 5 Copy re #4 Service Order - 2254 Petition, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) mailed to Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Carol Mici, and Petitioner, John Dutcher on 12/26/19. A copy of docket sheet was also mailed to the petitioner. (Lara, Miguel) |
| Filing 4 Chief Judge Patti B. Saris: SERVICE ORDER entered re 2254 Petition. Order entered pursuant to R.4 of the Rules governing Section 2254 cases for service on respondents. Answer/responsive pleading due w/in 21 days of receipt of this order. (Lara, Miguel) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee/payment: $5.00, receipt number 1BST077900 for #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) (Coppola, Katelyn) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Chief Judge Patti B. Saris assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein. (adminn, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28:2254, filed by John E. Dutcher. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Castilla, Francis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dutcher v. Mici | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: John E. Dutcher | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Carol Mici | |
| Represented By: | Anna E. Lumelsky |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
