Sartore v. Boston Scientific Corporation
| Linda Kay Sartore |
| Boston Scientific Corporation |
| 1:2019cv12601 |
| December 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Marianne B Bowler |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed Boston Scientific Corporation served on 1/31/2020, answer due 2/21/2020. (Bliss, Paula) |
| Filing 6 Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time. Scheduling Conference set for 3/11/2020 02:15 PM in Courtroom 25 before Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler. (Putnam, Harold) |
| Filing 5 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to 02/28/2020 to File Response to Plaintiff's Complaint by Boston Scientific Corporation.(White, Lisa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Lisa Oliver White on behalf of Boston Scientific Corporation (White, Lisa) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Halley, Taylor) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Danieli, Chris) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Boston Scientific Corporation Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0101-8032481 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Linda Kay Sartore. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form)(Bliss, Paula) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sartore v. Boston Scientific Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Boston Scientific Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Lisa Oliver White |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Linda Kay Sartore | |
| Represented By: | Paula S. Bliss |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
