The D.S. Brown Company v. White-Schiavone, JV et al
1:2019cv30095 |
October 29, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Boston Office |
Contract Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 116 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, the motion to dismiss filed by defendant Huntsman International LLC (Docket No. 92 ) is ALLOWED and The D.S. Brown Company's motion for reconsideration (Docket NO. 96 ) is DENIED. The claims against Huntsman International LLC are hereby DISMISSED. So ordered. (Vieira, Leonardo) |
Filing 90 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, the motion to dismiss filed by defendant Huntsman International LLC (part, but not all, of Docket No. 36 ) is ALLOWED but the motion to dismiss filed by White-Schiavone, JV, J.F. White Contracting Co. and Schiavone Construction Co., LLC (Docket No. 22 ) is DENIED.All claims asserted against Huntsman are hereby dismissed.So ordered.(Vieira, Leonardo) |
Filing 88 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: In view of the foregoing, the Court rules as follows:1) Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (part, but not all, of Docket No. 36 in Civil Act ion No. 19-30095) is DENIED. 2) White-Schaivone's motion to remand (Docket No. 30 in Civil Action No. 20-30043) is DENIED. 3) The request of White-Schiavone for an Order from this Court requiring The D.S. Brown Company to p ay its fees and costs associated with the preparation and filing of its motion (Docket No. 30 in Civil Action No. 20-30043) is treated as a motion and is DENIED. 4) The motion of The D.S. Brown Company to consolidate cases (Docket No. [62 ] in Civil Action No. 19-30095) is ALLOWED. White-Schiavone, JV v. The D.S. Brown Co., C.A. No. 20-30043-NMG, is consolidated for all purposes under the lead caption of The D.S. Brown Company v. White-Schiavone et al.,< /u> C.A. No. 19-30095-NMG. All future pleadings and submissions in both cases shall be filed in the first-filed case.Pursuant to the Order of this Court entered on May 6, 2020 (Docket No. 37 in Civil Action No. 20-30043) and this Order, the date for filing responsive pleadings to the Answer, Counterclaim and Third-Party Complaint of The D.S. Brown Company (Docket No. 22 ) is extended until 21 days after the forthcoming ruling of this Court on the remaining pending motions (Docket Nos. 22 and 36 in Civil Action No. 19-30095). So ordered. Associated Cases: 1:19-cv-30095-NMG, 1:20-cv-30043-NMG(Vieira, Leonardo) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: The D.S. Brown Company v. White-Schiavone, JV et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.