Custa Rojas v. McDonald et al
| Darwin Aliesky Cuesta Rojas and Darwin Aliesky Custa Rojas |
| William Barr, Joseph D. McDonald, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Antone Moniz |
| 1:2020cv10315 |
| February 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Patti B Saris |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Darwin Custa Rojas. (Lara, Miguel) |
| Filing 12 Copy re 11 Order,, mailed to Darwin Custa Rojas on 3/12/2020. (Lara, Miguel) |
| Filing 11 Judge Patti B. Saris: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.The petition (Docket No. #1 ) is DISMISSED because Petitioner is no longer a member of the Brito class. Petitioner has been ordered removed by the Immigration Court and his appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals has been denied. See Docket No. 10-1. Because there is a final order of removal, Petitioner is currently detained pursuant to 8 U.S.C. 1231, rather than 8 U.S.C. 1226(a). (Lara, Miguel) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint Petitioner's Habeas Petition by Joseph D. McDonald. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Farquhar, Rayford) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Rayford A. Farquhar on behalf of Antone Moniz (Farquhar, Rayford) |
| Filing 8 Judge Patti B. Saris: ORDER entered. SERVICE ORDER re 2241 Petition. 1. Antone Moniz, Superintendent of the Plymouth County Correctional Facility, is substituted as the respondent. 2. The Clerk shall serve the petition on the Respondent and the United States Attorney for the District of Massachusetts. 3. Within 14 days of the entry of this Order, Respondent shall notify the Court as to whether Respondent opposes Petitioner's request for a new bail hearing. If Respondent decides to oppose the request for a new bail hearing, then within 21 days of the entry of this Order, Respondent shall file a brief with supporting documentation, including the Order of the Immigration Judge with Respect to Custody, and if possible the transcript of the bond hearing. Petitioner shall file a reply brief with supporting documentation within 7 days of the filing of Respondent's brief. 4. In order to give the Court time to consider the matter, unless otherwise ordered by the Court, Petitioner shall not be moved outside the District of Massachusetts pending decision. (PSSA, 3) |
| Filing 7 Judge Patti B. Saris: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered finding as moot #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (payment for filing fee received). (PSSA, 3) |
| Filing 6 Filing fee/payment: $5.00, receipt number 1BST079154 for #1 Complaint (Coppola, Katelyn) |
| Filing 5 Judge Patti B. Saris: ORDER entered. STANDING ORDER on 2241 petitions regarding detention and removal of the Petitioner from the District of Massachusetts. (McDonagh, Christina) |
Filing 4
General Order 19-02, dated June 1, 2019 regarding Public Access to Immigration Cases Restricted by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c). (McDonagh, Christina)
|
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Patti B. Saris assigned to case. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Darwin Aliesky Cuesta Rojas. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Appeal Form)(Castilla, Francis) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against William Barr, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Joseph D. McDonald, filed by Darwin Aliesky Cuesta Rojas. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Castilla, Francis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
