Rauh et al v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
| Rauh, Amanda Rauh and Briana Rauh |
| GlaxoSmithKline, LLC |
| 1:2020cv10524 |
| March 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| F Dennis Saylor |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Jennifer M. Stevenson on behalf of GlaxoSmithKline, LLC (Stevenson, Jennifer) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Halley, Taylor) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF MDL CASE OPENED, Direct file in the District of Massachusetts; Rauh, et al v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. In Re: Zofran (Ondansetron) Products Liability Litigation, MDL 2657. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Chief Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV assigned to case. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against GlaxoSmithKline, LLC Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0101-8156642 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Amanda Rauh, Briana Rauh. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form)(Ayala, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
