Valle v. Moniz
| Hector Armando Valle |
| Joseph McDonald, Jr. and Antone Moniz |
| 1:2020cv10534 |
| March 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Patti B Saris |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Judge Patti B. Saris: ORDER entered. SERVICE ORDER re 2241 Petition. (PSSA, 5) |
| Filing 4 Judge Patti B. Saris: ORDER entered. STANDING ORDER on 2241 petitions regarding detention and removal of the Petitioner from the District of Massachusetts. (Lara, Miguel) |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Patti B. Saris assigned to case. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 2
General Order 19-02, dated June 1, 2019 regarding Public Access to Immigration Cases Restricted by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c). (Lara, Miguel)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number 0101-8159105 Fee status: Filing Fee paid., filed by Hector Armando Valle. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-5, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Category Form)(Kirshenbaum, Laura) Modified docket text on 3/17/2020 (Pacho, Arnold). |
| ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Duplicate Filing Fee and Credit for Refund, for $5.00 paid on 03/17/2020, receipt number 0101-8159044. (Tran, Henry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
