Jamal Brigham v. Spaulding
Petitioner: Keith Jamal Brigham
Respondent: Stephen Spaulding
Case Number: 1:2020cv10625
Filed: March 27, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: Jennifer C Boal
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 19, 2020 Filing 12 Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to 6/8/2020 to to respond to Petitioner's Motion for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (York, Steve)
May 19, 2020 Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to 6/8/2020 to to respond to Petitioner's Motion for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Stephen Spaulding.(Wan, Elysa)
May 15, 2020 Filing 10 Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal: ELECTRONIC ORDER ENTERED. Petitioner Keith Jamal Brigham has filed a consent form. Docket No. #9 . However, he has filled out both the consent to proceed before a U.S. magistrate judge and the refusal to consent before a U.S. magistrate judge sections so it is not clear whether he has consented or refused to consent to the jurisdiction of a U.S. magistrate judge for all purposes. The Clerk is directed to send Mr. Brigham a consent form and instructions again. Mr. Brigham is directed to fill out and return the form as soon as possible, this time filling out only the appropriate section depending on whether he wishes to consent to the jurisdiction of U.S. magistrate judge or not. If he consents, he should fill out the top portion only under the heading "Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge." If he does not wish to consent, then he should fill out the bottom portion only under the heading "Refusal to Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge." Consent to the assignment of a case to a magistrate judge is entirely voluntary, and no adverse consequences of any kind will redound to a party refusing to consent, but submission of the executed form, memorializing consent or refusal to consent to final assignment to the magistrate judge, is mandatory. (York, Steve)
May 14, 2020 Filing 9 CONSENT by to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Keith Jamal Brigham.. (York, Steve)
May 4, 2020 Filing 8 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Stephen Spaulding. (York, Steve)
May 4, 2020 Filing 7 Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal: ORDER entered. SERVICE ORDER re 2241 Petition. (PSSA, 5)
April 28, 2020 Filing 6 Filing fee/payment: $ 5.00, receipt number 1BST079809 for #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241). (Currie, Haley)
April 13, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Elysa Q. Wan on behalf of Stephen Spaulding (Wan, Elysa)
March 30, 2020 Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal: ORDER entered. Procedural Order regarding resolution of filing fee. Plaintiff must respond within 21 days. (Castilla, Francis)
March 27, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Finn, Mary)
March 27, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Writ of Habeas Corpus with Memorandum of Law by Keith Jamal Brigham.(Vieira, Leonardo)
March 27, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), filed by Keith Jamal Brigham.(Vieira, Leonardo)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jamal Brigham v. Spaulding
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Stephen Spaulding
Represented By: Elysa Q. Wan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Keith Jamal Brigham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?