Crowley v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
| Katherine Crowley |
| CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and Kevin Hourican |
| 1:2020cv10731 |
| April 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Leo T Sorokin |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Certified Copy of Notice of Removal Provided to Defense Counsel by mail (Vieira, Leonardo) |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Leo T. Sorokin assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by CVS Pharmacy, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent CVS Health Corporation for CVS Pharmacy, Inc... (Califano, Anthony) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Anthony S. Califano on behalf of CVS Pharmacy, Inc. (Califano, Anthony) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by CVS Pharmacy, Inc. ( Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0101-8196677 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. State Court Documents, #2 Exhibit B. Demand Letter, #3 Exhibit C. Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Local Category Form)(Califano, Anthony) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
