Andrade v. Medeiros
Petitioner: Herico Andrade
Respondent: Superintendent Sean Medeiros
Case Number: 1:2020cv10733
Filed: April 14, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: Douglas P Woodlock
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 14, 2020 Filing 6 First MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of James Rosseel Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number 0101-8197331 by Herico Andrade. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit of James W. Rosseel in support of Motion, #2 Affidavit Affidavit of Luke Rosseel in support of Motion)(Rosseel, Luke)
April 14, 2020 Filing 5 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Douglas P. Woodlock assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley. (Finn, Mary)
April 14, 2020 Filing 4 ELECTRONIC NOTICE TO COUNSEL: : Pursuant to the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures Section (G) Number (4): Any memorandum of law or other attachment filed in support of a main document shall be filed as a separate document, using the proper event. (Vieira, Leonardo)
April 14, 2020 Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE TO COUNSEL: : In the future all exhibits should be separated and filed as separate attachments. Counsel is reminded to review the local rules and the attorney handbook when filing documents with the Court by accessing our web page, at www.mad.uscourts.gov under CM/ECF E-Filing. (Vieira, Leonardo)
April 14, 2020 Filing 2 MEMORANDUM OF LAW by Herico Andrade in support re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254). (Vieira, Leonardo) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/14/2020: #1 Addendum) (Vieira, Leonardo).
April 14, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28:2254 Lead Document is Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number 0101-8196784 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid., filed by Herico Andrade. (Attachments: #1 Civil Action Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form, # 3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #4 Affidavit of Herico Andrade in support of Petition for Habeas Corpus, #5 Affidavit of Robert J Galibois II in support of Petition for Habeas Corpus, # 6 Memorandum and Addendum in support of Petition for Habeas Corpus, #7 Affidavit of James Rosseel in support of Petition for Habeas Corpus)(Rosseel, Luke) (Main Document 1 replaced on 4/14/2020) Counsel was advised to file the motion for leave to appear pro hac into its own entry. Clerk also filed the memorandum of law and petition for habeas corpus to its own entry (Vieira, Leonardo).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Andrade v. Medeiros
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Superintendent Sean Medeiros
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Herico Andrade
Represented By: Luke Rosseel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?