Andrade v. Medeiros
Herico Andrade |
Superintendent Sean Medeiros |
1:2020cv10733 |
April 14, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Douglas P Woodlock |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 First MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of James Rosseel Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number 0101-8197331 by Herico Andrade. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit of James W. Rosseel in support of Motion, #2 Affidavit Affidavit of Luke Rosseel in support of Motion)(Rosseel, Luke) |
Filing 5 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Douglas P. Woodlock assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC NOTICE TO COUNSEL: : Pursuant to the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures Section (G) Number (4): Any memorandum of law or other attachment filed in support of a main document shall be filed as a separate document, using the proper event. (Vieira, Leonardo) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE TO COUNSEL: : In the future all exhibits should be separated and filed as separate attachments. Counsel is reminded to review the local rules and the attorney handbook when filing documents with the Court by accessing our web page, at www.mad.uscourts.gov under CM/ECF E-Filing. (Vieira, Leonardo) |
Filing 2 MEMORANDUM OF LAW by Herico Andrade in support re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254). (Vieira, Leonardo) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/14/2020: #1 Addendum) (Vieira, Leonardo). |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28:2254 Lead Document is Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number 0101-8196784 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid., filed by Herico Andrade. (Attachments: #1 Civil Action Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form, # 3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #4 Affidavit of Herico Andrade in support of Petition for Habeas Corpus, #5 Affidavit of Robert J Galibois II in support of Petition for Habeas Corpus, # 6 Memorandum and Addendum in support of Petition for Habeas Corpus, #7 Affidavit of James Rosseel in support of Petition for Habeas Corpus)(Rosseel, Luke) (Main Document 1 replaced on 4/14/2020) Counsel was advised to file the motion for leave to appear pro hac into its own entry. Clerk also filed the memorandum of law and petition for habeas corpus to its own entry (Vieira, Leonardo). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Andrade v. Medeiros | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Superintendent Sean Medeiros | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Herico Andrade | |
Represented By: | Luke Rosseel |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.