Scanlon v. Manscaped, LLC
| David Scanlon |
| Manscaped, LLC |
| 1:2020cv10795 |
| April 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Judith G Dein |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered Allowed #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer.Set Deadlines as to: Manscaped, LLC answer due 6/18/2020. (Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde) |
| Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to 06/18/2020 to File Answer re #1 Complaint by David Scanlon. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Allowing Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading)(Broderick, Edward) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Edward A. Broderick on behalf of David Scanlon (Broderick, Edward) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed Manscaped, LLC served on 4/27/2020, answer due 5/18/2020. (Paronich, Anthony) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Warnock, Douglas) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Manscaped, LLC Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0101-8210527 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by David Scanlon. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Civil Category Form)(Paronich, Anthony) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Scanlon v. Manscaped, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: David Scanlon | |
| Represented By: | Anthony I. Paronich |
| Represented By: | Matthew P. McCue |
| Represented By: | Edward A. Broderick |
| Represented By: | Alex M. Washkowitz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Manscaped, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
