Singh v. Moniz
Plaintiff: Kawalpreet Singh
Defendant: Acting Secretary CHAD F. WOLF, FOD Todd Lyons, Joseph G. McDonald and US Attorney General William Barr
Respondent: Chad F Wolf, William Barr, Todd Lyons and Antone Moniz
Case Number: 1:2020cv10826
Filed: April 29, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: Allison D Burroughs
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 8, 2020 Filing 16 Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ORDER entered. ORDER DISMISSING CASE(McDonagh, Christina)
June 8, 2020 Filing 15 Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. Petitioner's motion to stay proceedings, [ECF No. #12 ], is DENIED. Respondent's motion to dismiss the petition, [ECF No. #9 ], is GRANTED. Petitioner concedes that he "does not qualify for Brito protection as he is subject to a final order of removal and his detention is governed by 8 U.S.C. 1231, 'the mandatory detention statute,' and not 1226(a)...." [ECF No. #11 at 2]. Petitioner's remaining challenge under the petition is to the duration of his detention pending removal. [ECF No. #11 at 3]. Once Petitioner became subject to a final order of removal, the clock reset on the amount of time he may be detained prior to removal. See Wang v. Ashcroft, 320 F.3d 130, 147 (2d Cir. 2003) (stating that Due Process claim under 1226 rendered moot when petitioner became subject to a final order of removal and was detained under 1231); Lovepreet v. Barr, No. 19-cv-06628, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 191091, at *2 (W.D.N.Y. Nov. 4, 2019) ("Petitioner asserts that his detention has become unconstitutional because he has been detained for over one year. However, prior to Petitioner's removal order becoming final, immigration authorities detained him under different statutory authority, so any claim pertaining to the earlier period of detention is immaterial to the validity of his present detention under 1231(a)(2)."); Flores v. Crawford, No. 06-cv-01089, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20974, at *3 (D. Ariz. Mar. 14, 2008) ("Neither statute allows for extended periods of detention, but because the 'clock' restarts every time his status changes, he remains in custody to date."). Because Petitioner has been in custody under 1231 effective March 2, 2020, Petitioner's petition, filed on April 29, 2020, is premature under Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 701 (2001). "Under Zadvydas, an alien subject to a final order of removal cannot challenge his detention until [a] six-month period has elapsed." Reid v. Donelan, 390 F. Supp. 3d 201, 220 (D. Mass. 2019); Lamotte v. Holder, No. 13-cv-00582, 2013 WL 1629135, at *2 (D. Mass. Apr. 9, 2013) (same). Petitioner remains a party in Augusto v. Moniz, 20-cv-10685, in which he can pursue his concerns related to confinement during the ongoing pandemic. (McDonagh, Christina)
May 20, 2020 Filing 14 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Reassignment. Judge Allison D. Burroughs added. Judge Patti B. Saris no longer assigned to case. (Finn, Mary)
May 20, 2020 Filing 13 Judge Patti B. Saris: ELECTRONIC ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Pursuant to Local Rule 40.1, the Court orders that this action be reassigned to Judge Allison D. Burroughs.(Lara, Miguel)
May 15, 2020 Filing 12 MOTION to Stay by Kawalpreet Singh. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Memorandum of Law in Support, #2 Text of Proposed Order PROPOSED ORDER)(Ghazialam, Bashir)
May 13, 2020 Filing 11 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Kawalpreet Singh. (Ghazialam, Bashir)
May 6, 2020 Filing 10 MEMORANDUM in Support re #9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by William Barr, Todd Lyons, Joseph G. McDonald, Chad F Wolf. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Marfissi Declaration, #2 Exhibit IJ Bond (1-24-2019), #3 Exhibit IJ Bond (3-26-2019), #4 Exhibit BIA Decision (3-2-2020), #5 Exhibit First Cir. Order (4-20-20))(Farquhar, Rayford)
May 6, 2020 Filing 9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by William Barr, Todd Lyons, Joseph G. McDonald, Chad F Wolf.(Farquhar, Rayford)
May 5, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Rayford A. Farquhar on behalf of Antone Moniz (Farquhar, Rayford)
April 30, 2020 Filing 7 Judge Patti B. Saris: ORDER entered. Antone Moniz is substituted as the respondent. See Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 439 (2004) (immediate custodian of petitioner is proper respondent in habeas action); Vasquez v. Reno, 233 F.3d 688, 696 (1st Cir. 2000) (same, as applied to immigration detainee). The other respondents are dismissed from this action without prejudice. The Clerk shall serve the petition on the Respondent and the United States Attorney for the District of Massachusetts. Within 7 days of the entry of this Order, Respondent shall file a brief with supporting documentation, including the Order of the Immigration Judge with Respect to Custody, and if possible the transcript of the bond hearing. Petitioner shall file a reply brief with supporting documentation within 7 days of the filing of Respondents brief. The reply brief shall specify whether the Petitioner has received a stay of removal from the First Circuit pending review of his removal order. In order to give the Court time to consider the matter, unless otherwise ordered by the Court, Petitioner shall not be moved outside the District of Massachusetts pending decision. (PSSA, 4)
April 30, 2020 Filing 6 Judge Patti B. Saris: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #2 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Bashir Ghazialam. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must register for electronic filing if the attorney does not already have an ECF account in this district. To register go to the Court website at www.mad.uscourts.gov. Select Case Information, then Electronic Filing (CM/ECF) and go to the CM/ECF Registration Form. (Lara, Miguel)
April 30, 2020 Filing 5 Judge Patti B. Saris: ORDER entered. STANDING ORDER on 2241 petitions regarding detention and removal of the Petitioner from the District of Massachusetts. (Lara, Miguel)
April 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 General Order 19-02, dated June 1, 2019 regarding Public Access to Immigration Cases Restricted by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c). (Baker, Casey)
April 30, 2020 Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Patti B. Saris assigned to case. (Finn, Mary)
April 29, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Bashir Ghazialam Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number 0101-8219255 by Kawalpreet Singh. (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Estrada, Carlos) (Attachment 1 replaced on 4/30/2020) (Lara, Miguel).
April 29, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number 0101-8219240 Fee status: Filing Fee paid., filed by Kawalpreet Singh. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form)(Estrada, Carlos)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Singh v. Moniz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Acting Secretary CHAD F. WOLF
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FOD Todd Lyons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joseph G. McDonald
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: US Attorney General William Barr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kawalpreet Singh
Represented By: Carlos E. Estrada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Chad F Wolf
Represented By: Rayford A. Farquhar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: William Barr
Represented By: Rayford A. Farquhar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Todd Lyons
Represented By: Rayford A. Farquhar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Antone Moniz
Represented By: Rayford A. Farquhar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?