Velez v. Turco et al
Camilo Velez |
Steven Silva, John McLean, Efrain Lopez and Thomas A Turco, III |
1:2020cv10957 |
May 18, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Marianne B Bowler |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Castilla, Francis) |
Filing 10 NOTICE: re payment of fee (prisoner filer) issued to the Treasurer at MCI Shirley (PSSA, 3) |
Filing 9 Consent Package (PSSA, 3) |
Filing 8 Notice to Plaintiff with Instructions for service by USMS; Local Rule 4.1 (PSSA, 3) |
Filing 7 Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler: ORDER entered granting #6 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. he Clerk shall issue summonses for all defendants. The Clerk shall provide Velez the form forConsent/Refusal of Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction and the instructions for that form. Velez shall ensure that the complaint, summonses, consent package, and this order are served on each defendant in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Service shall be completed within 90 days from the date of the issuances of the summonses. Because Velez is proceeding in forma pauperis, he may elect to have the USMS complete service with all costs of service to be advanced by the United States. The parties shall indicate their consent or refusal to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge by completing and separately filing the form entitled "Notice to Parties in Pro Se Prisoner Litigation Cases." (PSSA, 3) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Camilo Velez.(Putnam, Harold) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/19/2020: #1 Exhibit) (Putnam, Harold). |
Filing 5 Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler: ORDER entered. Procedural Order regarding resolution of filling fee. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff must respond within 21 days. (Castilla, Francis) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Camilo Velez. (Pacho, Arnold) |
Filing 3 Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler: ORDER entered. Procedural Order regarding resolution of filling fee. Plaintiff must respond within 21 days. (Castilla, Francis) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Camilo Velez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope)(Castilla, Francis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.