Decarvalho v. Sousa
| Janito Decarvalho |
| Todd Lyons, Thomas Hodgson and Steven Sousa |
| 1:2020cv11036 |
| June 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Patti B Saris |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Copy re #11 Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, #12 Order Dismissing Case mailed to Janito Decarvalho on 6/29/2020. (Baker, Casey) |
| Filing 12 Judge Patti B. Saris: ORDER DISMISSING CASE entered.(Baker, Casey) |
| Filing 11 Judge Patti B. Saris: Memorandum and Order entered. Respondents motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim (Docket No. 9) is GRANTED and Decarvalhos petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Docket No. 1) is DENIED without prejudice.(PSSA, 4) Modified on 6/29/2020 (Lara, Miguel). |
| Filing 10 MEMORANDUM in Support re #9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Steven Sousa. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Farquhar, Rayford) |
| Filing 9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Steven Sousa.(Farquhar, Rayford) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Rayford A. Farquhar on behalf of Steven Sousa (Farquhar, Rayford) |
| Filing 7 Judge Patti B. Saris: ORDER entered. SERVICE ORDER re 2241 Petition. 1. Petitioner's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs is GRANTED. 2. Steven Souza, the Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Correction, shall be deemed the sole Respondent in this action. See Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 439 (2004) (immediate custodian of petitioner is proper respondent in habeas action); Vasquez v. Reno, 233 F.3d 688, 696 (1st Cir. 2000) (same, as applied to immigration detainee). Lyons and Hodgson are dismissed from this action without prejudice. 3. The Clerk shall serve a copy of the petition on the Respondent and the United States Attorney for the District of Massachusetts. 4. The Respondent shall, within 10 days of the entry of this Order, file an answer or other responsive pleading. Petitioner shall file a reply brief within 7 days of the filing of Respondents brief. 5.In order to give the Court time to consider the matter, unless otherwise ordered by the Court, the Respondent shall provide the Court with at least 48 hours advance notice of any scheduled removal of the Petitioner, and any scheduled transfer of the Petitioner out of the jurisdiction. (PSSA, 4) |
| Filing 6 Judge Patti B. Saris: STANDING ORDER entered on 2241 petitions regarding detention and removal of the Petitioner from the District of Massachusetts. (Lara, Miguel) |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Patti B. Saris assigned to case. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 4
General Order 19-02, dated June 1, 2019 regarding Public Access to Immigration Cases Restricted by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c). (Baker, Casey)
|
| Filing 3 Online access to documents in this case is limited to counsel of record only. All documents are available for review in the Office of the Clerk. Counsel of record: please note that you will need to log into CM/ECF to access any documents in this case. (Baker, Casey) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Janito Decarvalho.(Baker, Casey) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), filed by Janito Decarvalho. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-K, #2 Cover Letter)(Baker, Casey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
