Lin v. CGIT Systems, Inc.
| YiYu Lin |
| CGIT Systems, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv11051 |
| June 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Marianne B Bowler |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 REPLY to Response to #6 MOTION to Dismiss Counts I, II and III of the Complaint filed by CGIT Systems, Inc.. (Sousa, Sarah) |
| Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #14 Motion for Leave to File Document ; Counsel using the Electronic Case Filing System should now file the document for which leave to file has been granted in accordance with the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. Counsel must include - Leave to file granted on (date of order)- in the caption of the document. (Bowler, Marianne) |
| Filing 14 MOTION for Leave to File Reply Brief in Support of its Motion to Dismiss by CGIT Systems, Inc..(Sousa, Sarah) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of correction to the docket: 8/10/2020 hearing on #6 Motion to Dismiss will be heard by telephone, not video. Please call 888-675-2535 approximately five minutes prior to the hearing, using Access Code 6641794. (Putnam, Harold) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah E.A. Sousa on behalf of CGIT Systems, Inc. (Sousa, Sarah) |
| Filing 11 ELECTRONIC NOTICE Setting Hearing on Motion #6 MOTION to Dismiss Counts I, II and III of the Complaint : This hearing will be conducted by video conference. Counsel of record will receive a video conference invite at the email registered in CM/ECF. If you have technical or compatibility issues with the technology, please notify the session's courtroom deputy as soon as possible.Access to the hearing will be made available to the media and public. In order to gain access to the hearing, you must sign up at the following address: #https://public.mad.uscourts.gov/seating-signup.html. For questions regarding access to hearings, you may refer to the Court's general orders and public notices available on #www.mad.uscourts.gov or contact media@mad.uscourts.gov. Motion Hearing set for 8/10/2020 12:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler. (Putnam, Harold) |
| Filing 10 CONSENT by all parties to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by YiYu Lin.. (Szal, Mark) |
| Filing 9 Opposition re #6 MOTION to Dismiss Counts I, II and III of the Complaint filed by YiYu Lin. (Szal, Mark) |
| Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File. (Bowler, Marianne) |
| Filing 8 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to 06/17/2020 to File Opposition to Defendant's Partial Motion to Dismiss by YiYu Lin.(Szal, Mark) |
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Support re #6 MOTION to Dismiss Counts I, II and III of the Complaint filed by CGIT Systems, Inc.. (DeWick, John) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss Counts I, II and III of the Complaint by CGIT Systems, Inc..(DeWick, John) |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by CGIT Systems, Inc.. (DeWick, John) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed CGIT Systems, Inc. served on 6/5/2020, answer due 6/26/2020. (Szal, Mark) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to CGIT Systems, Inc.. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Burgos, Sandra) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CGIT Systems, Inc. Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0101-8268460 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by YiYu Lin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Category Form)(Szal, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lin v. CGIT Systems, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: YiYu Lin | |
| Represented By: | Mark D. Szal |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CGIT Systems, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | John E. DeWick |
| Represented By: | Sarah E.A. Sousa |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
