Xenics USA, Inc. v. Imaging Tech Solutions, Inc.
| Xenics USA, Inc. |
| Imaging Tech Solutions, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv11412 |
| July 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Richard G Stearns |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. Defendant Imaging Tech Solutions, Inc., having filed an Answer and counterclaim in this case, the court enters the following pretrial schedule:Initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) must be completed by 10/22/20; Motions for leave to Amend Pleadings & Joinder of Parties must be filed by 11/20/20. Without leave of court, the parties are permitted to serve 30 interrogatories, 30 requests for admissions and 30 document requests, to be filed within the 30 days of the initial disclosures. The court expects responses to be made in thirty days, unless a request for additional time is granted. A party may not notice more than 6 deponents without leave of court on a showing of good cause. If the parties would like to participate in the court's mediation program, they must notify our docket clerk Arnold Pacho (617-748-9812) by 2/22/21 (it may take several weeks to get a mediation date). All fact discovery must be completed no later than 3/26/21. Dispositive Motions are due by 4/19/21, with Oppositions to dispositive motions due 5/10/21; Reply, if any, by leave of court. If a party intends to utilize an expert, they must file a notice on the docket no later than 1/15/21, in order for the court to consider whether an expert is appropriate and, if so, to alter the existing schedule. (Zierk, Marsha) |
| Filing 14 Defendant Imaging Tech Solutions' ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand , COUNTERCLAIM against Xenics USA, Inc. by Imaging Tech Solutions, Inc..(Zamaloff, Matthew) |
| Filing 13 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer - Imaging Tech Solutions, Inc. answer is due 9/23/2020. However, as the court is affording defendant nearly 60 days to respond to the Complaint, it is not inclined to further extension. (Zierk, Marsha) |
| Filing 12 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to September 23, 2020 to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Imaging Tech Solutions, Inc..(Zamaloff, Matthew) |
| Filing 11 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Imaging Tech Solutions, Inc.. (Zamaloff, Matthew) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew J. Zamaloff on behalf of Imaging Tech Solutions, Inc. (Zamaloff, Matthew) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Gregg P. Bailey on behalf of Imaging Tech Solutions, Inc. (Bailey, Gregg) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Rory J. Fitzpatrick on behalf of Imaging Tech Solutions, Inc. (Fitzpatrick, Rory) |
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE Executed by Xenics USA, Inc.. Imaging Tech Solutions, Inc. served on 8/1/2020, answer due 8/24/2020. Acknowledgement filed by Xenics USA, Inc.. (Shanahan, Emily) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Imaging Tech Solutions, Inc.. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Pacho, Arnold) |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Richard G. Stearns assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by John D. Stuebing on behalf of Xenics USA, Inc. (Stuebing, John) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Emily C. Shanahan on behalf of Xenics USA, Inc. (Shanahan, Emily) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Xenics USA, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Xenics, N.V. for Xenics USA, Inc... (Shanahan, Emily) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND against Imaging Tech Solutions, Inc. Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0101-8346098 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Xenics USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Civil Cover Sheet (Civil Cover Sheet), #5 Civil Cover Sheet (D. Mass. Category Form))(Shanahan, Emily) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Xenics USA, Inc. v. Imaging Tech Solutions, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Xenics USA, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | John D. Stuebing |
| Represented By: | Emily C. Shanahan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Imaging Tech Solutions, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Gregg P. Bailey |
| Represented By: | Rory J. Fitzpatrick |
| Represented By: | Matthew J. Zamaloff |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
