MacKenzie v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
Anne MacKenzie |
Warner Lambert Company, LLC, Pfizer, Inc., Pharmacia Corporation, Parke, Davis & Co., Warner Lambert Company, Pharmacia LLC, Warner-Lambert Company LLC, Parke, Davis & Company LLC and Warner-Lambert Company |
1:2020cv11550 |
August 18, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Judith G Dein |
Nathaniel M Gorton |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein Referred for: Events Only (e). Motions referred: #9 MOTION for More Definite Statement . (Lima, Christine) Motions referred to Judith G. Dein. |
Filing 10 MEMORANDUM in Support re #9 MOTION for More Definite Statement filed by Parke, Davis & Company LLC, Pfizer, Inc., Pharmacia LLC, Warner-Lambert Company LLC. (Lumsden, Dana) |
Filing 9 MOTION for More Definite Statement by Parke, Davis & Company LLC, Pfizer, Inc., Pharmacia LLC, Warner-Lambert Company LLC.(Lumsden, Dana) |
Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Parke, Davis & Company LLC, Pfizer, Inc., Pharmacia LLC, Warner-Lambert Company LLC. (Lumsden, Dana) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Dana C. Lumsden on behalf of Parke, Davis & Company LLC, Pfizer, Inc., Pharmacia LLC, Warner-Lambert Company LLC (Lumsden, Dana) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Parke, Davis & Company LLC, Pharmacia LLC, Warner-Lambert Company LLC. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Vieira, Leonardo) |
Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Pfizer, Inc., Pharmacia LLC f/k/a Pharmacia Corporation, Parke, Davis & Company LLC as successor-in-interest of Parke, Davis & Company, Warner-Lambert Company LLC f/k/a Warner-Lambert Company, filed by Anne MacKenzie. (Attachments: #1 Summons - PARKE, DAVIS & COMPANY LLC, #2 Summons - PHARMACIA LLC, #3 Summons - WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY LLC)(Kassan, Randi) |
Filing 4 Civil Cover Sheet & Category Sheet re #1 Complaint, by Anne MacKenzie. (Kassan, Randi) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Coppola, Katelyn) |
Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Warner Lambert Company, LLC, Parke, Davis & Co., Pharmacia Corporation, Pfizer, Inc., Warner Lambert Company Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0101-8378038 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Anne MacKenzie. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons - Parke, Davis & Co., #3 Summons - Pfizer, #4 Summons - Pharmacia Corporation, #5 Summons - Warner Lambert Company, #6 Summons - Warner Lambert Company, LLC)(Kassan, Randi) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.