Christenson v. Davidson et al
| Mark C Christenson |
| David Davidson, Brad Shup and John Donelson |
| 1:2020cv11573 |
| August 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Richard G Stearns |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ORDER entered. ORDER DISMISSING CASE(PSSA, 3) |
| Filing 6 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ORDER entered. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee.(PSSA, 3) |
| Filing 5 Mail [Dkt # 3] resent to Mark Christenson returned as undeliverable. (Pacho, Arnold) |
| Filing 4 Mail [Dkt # 3] sent to Mark Christenson returned as undeliverable. (Pacho, Arnold) |
| Filing 3 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ORDER entered. Procedural Order regarding resolution of filing fee. Plaintiff must respond within 21 days. (Castilla, Francis) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Richard G. Stearns assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (Danieli, Chris) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Mark C Christenson.(Castilla, Francis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
