Lewis v. Souza
| Conroy Lewis |
| Superintendent Steven J. Souza |
| 1:2020cv11838 |
| October 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Patti B Saris |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 Judge Patti B. Saris: ORDER OF DISMISSAL entered. (Baker, Casey) |
| Filing 17 Judge Patti B. Saris: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. Petitioner's mandatory detention under 8 U.S.C. 1226(c) has been unreasonably prolonged and Petitioner therefore is entitled to a bond hearing before an Immigration Judge. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus [Docket No. #1 ] is accordingly ALLOWED.The Court ORDERS that Petitioner receive, within seven calendar days, a bond hearing that complies with the requirements of the permanent injunction in Reid v. Donelan, 390 F. Supp. 3d 201, 228 (D. Mass. 2019).SO ORDERED. (Baker, Casey) |
| Filing 16 SUR-REPLY to Motion re #13 MOTION for Leave to File Response to Reply filed by Steven J. Souza. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Declaration)(Kanwit, Thomas) |
| Filing 15 Judge Patti B. Saris: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #13 Motion for Leave to File Reply ; Counsel using the Electronic Case Filing System should now file the document for which leave to file has been granted in accordance with the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. Counsel must include - Leave to file granted on (date of order)- in the caption of the document. (Baker, Casey) |
| Filing 14 Opposition re #13 MOTION for Leave to File Response filed by Conroy Lewis. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Orihuela, Marisol) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Leave to File Response by Steven J. Souza.(Kanwit, Thomas) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE/ANSWER to Respondent's Opposition to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Conroy Lewis. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration with Exhibits)(Orihuela, Marisol) |
| Filing 11 Judge Patti B. Saris: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #9 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Marisol Orihuela. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must register for electronic filing if the attorney does not already have an ECF account in this district. To register go to the Court website at www.mad.uscourts.gov. Select Case Information, then Electronic Filing (CM/ECF) and go to the CM/ECF Registration Form. (Baker, Casey) |
| Filing 10 Judge Patti B. Saris: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #8 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Sara Zampierin. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must register for electronic filing if the attorney does not already have an ECF account in this district. To register go to the Court website at www.mad.uscourts.gov. Select Case Information, then Electronic Filing (CM/ECF) and go to the CM/ECF Registration Form. (Baker, Casey) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Marisol Orihuela Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number 0101-8475163 by Conroy Lewis. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Wishnie, Michael) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Sara Zampierin Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number 0101-8475158 by Conroy Lewis. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Wishnie, Michael) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE/ANSWER to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Steven J. Souza. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Kanwit, Thomas) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas E. Kanwit on behalf of Steven J. Souza (Kanwit, Thomas) |
| Filing 5 Judge Patti B. Saris: ORDER entered. SERVICE ORDER re 2241 Petition. The Respondent shall, within 7 days of the entry of this Order, file an answer or other responsive pleading. Petitioner shall file a reply brief within 7 days of the filing of Respondent's brief. (PSSA, 3) |
| Filing 4 Judge Patti B. Saris: STANDING ORDER entered on 2241 petitions regarding detention and removal of the Petitioner from the District of Massachusetts. (Baker, Casey) |
Filing 3
General Order 19-02, dated June 1, 2019 regarding Public Access to Immigration Cases Restricted by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c). (Baker, Casey)
|
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Patti B. Saris assigned to case. (Finn, Mary) |
| Case reopened. (Garvin, Brendan) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number 0101-8457526 Fee status: Filing Fee paid., filed by Conroy Lewis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form)(Wishnie, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lewis v. Souza | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Conroy Lewis | |
| Represented By: | Michael J. Wishnie |
| Represented By: | Marisol Orihuela |
| Represented By: | Sara Zampierin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Superintendent Steven J. Souza | |
| Represented By: | Thomas E. Kanwit |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
