Johnson v. United States of America
| Tyrone Johnson |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 1:2020cv11986 |
| November 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Marianne B Bowler |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 f |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Danieli, Chris)
|
|
Filing 9
Case transferred in from District of South Carolina; Case Number 1:20-cv-03718.
|
|
Filing 7
OPINION & ORDER adopting the #4 Report and Recommendation and ordering that Johnson's 2241 petition is transferred to the District of Massachusetts. Signed by Honorable Henry M. Herlong, Jr on 11/3/2020. (lbak)
|
|
Filing 6
OBJECTION to #4 Report and Recommendation by Tyrone Johnson. Reply to Objections due by 11/16/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (mmcd)
|
|
Filing 5
***DOCUMENT MAILED #4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Tyrone Johnson, 02948-000, Federal Medical Center - Devens, Post Office Box 879, Ayers, MA 01432. (lbak)
|
|
Filing 4
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending this case be transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. Objections to R&R due by 11/6/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 10/23/2020. (lbak)
|
|
Filing 2
TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Columbia. (lbak)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Tyrone Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (lbak)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Johnson v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Tyrone Johnson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
