Jacob v. Det Guy
| Michael Jacob |
| Guy and Det Guy |
| 1:2020cv12009 |
| November 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Marianne B Bowler |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Guy. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Castilla, Francis) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF (instructions for service by USMS) and copy of Local Rule 4.1. (PSSA, 4) |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler: ORDER entered.1.The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (#2) is granted. 2.The Clerk shall provide the plaintiff with the form for Consent/Refusal of Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction and the instructions for that form (consent package). The parties shall indicate their consent or refusal to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge by completing and separately filing the form entitled Notice to Parties in Pro Se Prisoner Litigation Cases. The form must be filed on paper within thirty days after the date of service on the last party.3.The Clerk shall issue a summons for service of the complaint on Det. Guy and the plaintiff shall serve the summons, complaint, consent package, and this Order in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 4.Because the plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, he may elect to have the United States Marshals Service (USMS) complete service with all costs of service to be advanced by the United States. If so asked by the plaintiff, the USMS shall serve copies of the summons, complaint, the consent package, and this Order upon the named defendant as directed by plaintiff. The plaintiff is responsible for providing the USMS all copies for service and for completing a USM-285 form for each party to be served. The Clerk shall provide the plaintiff with forms and instructions for service by the USMS. 5.The plaintiff shall have 90 days from the date of the issuance of the summons to complete service. (Attachments: #1 consent package) (PSSA, 4) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael Jacob.(Castilla, Francis) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Guy, filed by Michael Jacob. (Attachments: #1 Category Form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Statement of Claim, #4 Exhibit)(Castilla, Francis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
