Lu v. Clarke et al
Friedrich Lu |
James R Clarke, Charles W Rankin, James L Sultan, Mary Regan, Maura A Hennigan, Robert L Sheketoff, Carol A. Mici, Matthew Divris, Joseph Stanton and Thomas A Turco, III |
1:2020cv12010 |
November 9, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Indira Talwani |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 Set/Reset Deadlines as to #7 MOTION for Summary Judgment, #8 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 2/5/2021 (Vieira, Leonardo) |
Filing 16 Judge Indira Talwani: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered ALLOWING #15 Motion for Extension of Time to File; granting #15 Motion for Extension of Time (Vieira, Leonardo) |
Filing 15 Emergency MOTION for Extension of Time to 02/05/21 to File Responses to Plaintiff's Filings, Emergency MOTION for Extension of Time to 02/05/21 Responses to Plaintiff's Filings ( Responses due by 1/20/2021) by Maura A Hennigan, Mary Regan.(Morin, Erica) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Erica Morin on behalf of Maura A Hennigan, Mary Regan (Morin, Erica) |
Filing 13 MEMORANDUM in Support re #12 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and for Failure to Comply with Court Order filed by Charles W Rankin, James L Sultan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 - Judge Wolf's Order, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2 - First Circuit Order, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3 - Judge Dein's Order)(Rankin, Charles) |
Filing 12 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and for Failure to Comply with Court Order by Charles W Rankin, James L Sultan.(Rankin, Charles) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by James L. Sultan on behalf of Charles W Rankin, James L Sultan (Sultan, James) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Charles W. Rankin on behalf of Charles W Rankin, James L Sultan (Rankin, Charles) |
Filing 9 Request for Entry of Default Against Regan and Hennigan by Friedrich Lu. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Kelly, Danielle) |
Filing 8 Plaintiff's MOTION for Summary Judgment Against Three Clerks by Friedrich Lu. (Kelly, Danielle) |
Filing 7 Plaintiff's MOTION for Summary Judgment Against Prison Officials by Friedrich Lu. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Kelly, Danielle) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Kelly, Danielle) |
Filing 5 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Friedrich Lu. (Kelly, Danielle) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Warnock, Douglas) |
Filing 3 Filing fee/payment: $ 400.00, receipt number 1BST082512 for #1 Complaint (Barbosa, Nilsa) |
Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Indira Talwani assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Friedrich Lu. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Category Sheet)(Vieira, Leonardo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.