Eastern Bank v. Corax International, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Eastern Bank
Defendant: Warnock & Associates, LLC, Rudolph M. Warnock, Jr. and Corax International, LLC
Case Number: 1:2020cv12133
Filed: November 30, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: Rya W Zobel
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instrument
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 21, 2021 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed Corax International, LLC served on 12/31/2020, answer due 1/21/2021. (Hixon, Jonathan)
January 20, 2021 Filing 7 Judge Rya W. Zobel: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint, Rudolph M. Warnock, Jr answer due 3/5/2021. (45 days) (Urso, Lisa)
January 19, 2021 Filing 6 First Opposition re #5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, filed by Eastern Bank. (Hixon, Jonathan)
January 15, 2021 Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to 60 to 90 days to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Rudolph M. Warnock, Jr.(Currie, Haley)
January 11, 2021 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed Rudolph M. Warnock, Jr served on 12/22/2020, answer due 1/12/2021. (Hixon, Jonathan)
November 30, 2020 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Halley, Taylor)
November 30, 2020 Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Rya W. Zobel assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler. (Finn, Mary)
November 30, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0101-8530483 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Eastern Bank. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-D, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Category Form Sheet)(Hixon, Jonathan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Eastern Bank v. Corax International, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Warnock & Associates, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rudolph M. Warnock, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Corax International, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eastern Bank
Represented By: Jonathan Hixon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?