EBO International Inc. v. Hsu
| EBO International Inc. |
| Charles Hsu |
| 1:2020cv12295 |
| December 29, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| F Dennis Saylor |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Chief Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time; granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Charles Hsu answer due 3/10/2021. (Halley, Taylor) |
| Filing 10 Third MOTION for Extension of Time to March 10, 2021 to Answer Complaint, Third MOTION for Extension of Time to March 10, 2021 to File Answer ( Responses due by 3/10/2021) by Charles Hsu.(Dai, Connie) |
| Filing 9 Chief Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time; answer due 2/24/2021. (Bono, Christine) |
| Filing 8 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to February 24, 2021 to Answer Complaint by Charles Hsu.(Dai, Connie) |
| Filing 7 Chief Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer; Charles Hsu answer due 2/3/2021. (Bono, Christine) |
| Filing 6 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to February 3, 2021 to File Answer by Charles Hsu.(Dai, Connie) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Connie C. Dai on behalf of Charles Hsu (Dai, Connie) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed Charles Hsu served on 12/30/2020, answer due 1/20/2021. (Pirozzolo, Jack) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Vieira, Leonardo) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Chief Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Charles Hsu Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number 0101-8570810 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by EBO International Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Summons - Charles Hsu, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Category Form)(Pirozzolo, Jack) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: EBO International Inc. v. Hsu | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: EBO International Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Jack W. Pirozzolo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Charles Hsu | |
| Represented By: | Connie C. Dai |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
