Cafarelle v. Yazwinski et al
Ronald D Cafarelle |
H Williams Arleas, III, Michael Kryzanek, Ronald Chapman, Catherine Finn, Michael Achin, Rev. Joln E Denney, Ken DeDominici, Carey Anne Beach, John Yazwinski, Al Becher and James Olsen |
1:2021cv10230 |
February 10, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Richard G Stearns |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Ronald D Cafarelle. (Pacho, Arnold) |
Filing 5 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. re #4 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis "The court clarifies that failure to comply with its February 24, 2021 order (Dkt. 4) will likely result in dismissal of this action."(PSSA, 5) |
Filing 4 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ORDER entered granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (PSSA, 5) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Richard G. Stearns assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ronald D Cafarelle. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Castilla, Francis) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Ronald D Cafarelle. (Attachments: #1 Supplement, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Castilla, Francis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.