Prunty v. Gray
Daniel Prunty |
Dean Gray |
1:2021cv10337 |
March 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Nathaniel M Gorton |
Mark L Wolf |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: BRIEFING ORDER entered. (Lima, Christine) |
Filing 12 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #11 Motion for Order (Lima, Christine) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Order to schedule by Dean Gray.(Badway, Eva) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE/ANSWER to petition for a writ of habeas corpus by Dean Gray. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State court documents, #2 Exhibit State court transcript, #3 Exhibit State court transcript, #4 Exhibit State court transcript, #5 Exhibit State court transcript, #6 Exhibit State court transcipt, #7 Exhibit State court transcript, #8 Exhibit State court transcript, #9 Exhibit State court transcript, #10 Exhibit State court transcript, #11 Exhibit State court transcript, #12 Exhibit State court transcript, #13 Exhibit State court transcript)(Badway, Eva) |
Filing 9 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered ALLOWING #7 Motion for Extension of Time (Vieira, Leonardo) |
Filing 8 NOTICE by Dean Gray Regarding Existence of Victim (Badway, Eva) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to May 3, 2021 to Answer by Dean Gray.(Badway, Eva) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Eva M. Badway on behalf of Dean Gray (Badway, Eva) |
Filing 5 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Reassignment. Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton added. Judge Mark L. Wolf no longer assigned to case. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 4 Judge Mark L. Wolf: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered.In accordance with the Court's Local Rule 40.1, the Clerk shall randomly reassign the case to another district judge.(Montes, Mariliz) |
Filing 3 Judge Mark L. Wolf: SERVICE ORDER entered re 2254 Petition. Order entered pursuant to R.4 of the Rules governing Section 2254 cases for service on respondents. Answer/responsive pleading due w/in 21 days of receipt of this order. (Baker, Casey) |
Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Mark L. Wolf assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28:2254 Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number 0101-8657703 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid., filed by Daniel Prunty. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 category form)(Quintilian, Patricia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Prunty v. Gray | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Dean Gray | |
Represented By: | Eva M. Badway |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Daniel Prunty | |
Represented By: | Patricia A. Quintilian |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.