Prunty v. Gray
Petitioner: Daniel Prunty
Respondent: Dean Gray
Case Number: 1:2021cv10337
Filed: March 1, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: Nathaniel M Gorton
Referring Judge: Mark L Wolf
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 27, 2021 Filing 13 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: BRIEFING ORDER entered. (Lima, Christine)
April 27, 2021 Filing 12 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #11 Motion for Order (Lima, Christine)
April 26, 2021 Filing 11 MOTION for Order to schedule by Dean Gray.(Badway, Eva)
April 26, 2021 Filing 10 RESPONSE/ANSWER to petition for a writ of habeas corpus by Dean Gray. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State court documents, #2 Exhibit State court transcript, #3 Exhibit State court transcript, #4 Exhibit State court transcript, #5 Exhibit State court transcript, #6 Exhibit State court transcipt, #7 Exhibit State court transcript, #8 Exhibit State court transcript, #9 Exhibit State court transcript, #10 Exhibit State court transcript, #11 Exhibit State court transcript, #12 Exhibit State court transcript, #13 Exhibit State court transcript)(Badway, Eva)
March 19, 2021 Filing 9 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered ALLOWING #7 Motion for Extension of Time (Vieira, Leonardo)
March 18, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE by Dean Gray Regarding Existence of Victim (Badway, Eva)
March 18, 2021 Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to May 3, 2021 to Answer by Dean Gray.(Badway, Eva)
March 18, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Eva M. Badway on behalf of Dean Gray (Badway, Eva)
March 9, 2021 Filing 5 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Reassignment. Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton added. Judge Mark L. Wolf no longer assigned to case. (Finn, Mary)
March 8, 2021 Filing 4 Judge Mark L. Wolf: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered.In accordance with the Court's Local Rule 40.1, the Clerk shall randomly reassign the case to another district judge.(Montes, Mariliz)
March 1, 2021 Filing 3 Judge Mark L. Wolf: SERVICE ORDER entered re 2254 Petition. Order entered pursuant to R.4 of the Rules governing Section 2254 cases for service on respondents. Answer/responsive pleading due w/in 21 days of receipt of this order. (Baker, Casey)
March 1, 2021 Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Mark L. Wolf assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley. (Finn, Mary)
March 1, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28:2254 Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number 0101-8657703 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid., filed by Daniel Prunty. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 category form)(Quintilian, Patricia)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Prunty v. Gray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Dean Gray
Represented By: Eva M. Badway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Daniel Prunty
Represented By: Patricia A. Quintilian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?